Betriebliche Altersversorgung – Facts&Fiction: Support fund – Investment fraud with built-in employer liability ?

*by Johannes Fiala, Lawyer (Munich), MBA Financial Services (Univ.Wales), MM (Univ.), Certified Financial and Investment Advisor (A.F.A.), EC Expert (C.I.F.E.), Lecturer (Univ. of Cooperative Education), Banker (www.fiala.de ) and Dipl.-Math. Peter A. Schramm, Actuary DAV (Diethardt), Actuarial Expert (www.pkv-gutachter.de ) “Smile and be happy, it could be worse!” And I laughed and was glad – […]

Eine wichtige Information für Arbeitnehmer mit betrieblicher Altersversorgung und für Betriebsräte

Date: 27 April 2007 at 8:48 am Category: Other interesting contributions Author: Albrecht Müller A recent ruling by the Munich Regional Labour Court confirms that the offsetting of acquisition costs in the first few years – in particular by means of “Zillmerung” – is impermissible in occupational pension schemes with deferred compensation. (Zillmerisation means that […]

Legal advice for your private pension provision

Private pension provision and its pitfalls Anyone who wants to take out insurance for old age cannot afford to ignore a private pension plan today. The standard of living with the statutory pension in the future is doubtful. A well thought-out concept for a private pension scheme is therefore equally important for self-employed and employees. […]

Company pension scheme Managing director and shareholder-managing director

Loss of company pension scheme for managing directors in the event of insolvency The company pension scheme has increasingly become the focus of public interest in recent years due to changes and adjustments in pension policy. Politicians are increasingly shifting the issue of pensions into the personal responsibility of employees and employers, which means that […]

Company pension scheme: Early termination of insurance contracts in the event of a change of employer

By Dr. Johannes Fiala and Thomas Keppel Reader A. S. asks: In the July 2007 issue of BC, I read with great interest the article on occupational pension provision and the employer’s obligation to offset losses in the case of deferred compensation. Subsequently, I invited our insurance agent for a discussion. He informed me, among […]

Company pension scheme: Early termination of insurance contracts in the event of a change of employer

Reader A. S. asks: In the BC July 2007 issue, I read with great interest the article on occupational pensions and the employer’s obligation to offset losses in the case of deferred compensation. Following this, I invited our insurance agent to come in for a chat. He informed me inter alia: In the example case […]

Company pension scheme: Employer’s obligation to offset losses in the case of deferred compensation

By Dr. Johannes Fiala and Thomas Keppel In the case of occupational pension schemes with deferred compensation, in the first contribution years the insurance company usually offsets the acquisition costs (e.g. brokerage commissions) against the premiums paid in. According to a recent ruling by the Munich Regional Labor Court (Landesarbeitsgericht – LAG), such agreements are […]

Give me my money back!

(06.06.2007) von Richard Lamers Das kann teuer werden. Für den Arbeitgeber. Ein aktuelles Urteil des Münchener Landesarbeitsgerichts stärkt allen Arbeitnehmern den Rücken, die über eine Gehaltsumwandlung ihre Rente aufbessern wollen. übersicht: 1. Gib mir mein Geld zurück! 2. Deutsche Chefs in der Pflicht 3. Jenseits von Versicherungen Eine Autoverkäuferin aus Rosenheim hatte 35 Monate jeweils […]

One to zero against zillmerization

By Nicholas Bora Published on: 25 June 2007 The Munich ruling is causing a stir: consumer protectionists are calling it a “breakthrough”, employers want legal certainty and, above all, no liability, insurers are cautious in their comments – and the aba wants to prevent occupational pension schemes from falling into disrepute. One thing is certain: […]

Judgement LArbG Munich: Employer liable for Zillmerung!!!

Neues Urteil des Landesarbeitsgericht München: Arbeitgeber haftet für Zillmerung. über 100 Milliarden Potential für Arbeitgeberhaftung durch Entgeltumwandlung. Arbeitgeber dürfen bei betrieblicher Altersversorgung oft „doppelt zahlen“!* *von Dr. Johannes Fiala, Rechtsanwalt (München), Mediator (Univ.), MBA Finanzdienstleistungen (Univ.Wales), MM (Univ.), geprüfter Finanz- und Anlageberater (A.F.A.), Lehrbeauftragter für Bürgerliches Recht und Versicherungsrecht (Univ. of Cooperative Education), Bankkaufmann (www.fiala.de), […]