Beyond insurance

Information irrelevant Contracts for occupational pension schemes are a recurring concern of the courts.

In 2005, for example, the Stuttgart Labour Court awarded compensation to a personnel manager who had not been precisely informed by his boss about the contractual agreements (Az 19 Ca 3153/04). The current ruling now goes one step further.

This was because the car dealership owner had dutifully informed her employees about the terms of the salary conversion. Although the lower court, the Rosenheim Labor Court, had still ruled on whether this clarification was sufficient, which was disputed between the parties, this fact was irrelevant for the Munich Regional Labor Court:

Contracts with Zillmerisation in the context of deferred compensation were inadmissible in any case.

 

reasons enough

The court was not stingy with arguments when handing down the verdict.

“The court based its ruling on four legal grounds; even one would have been enough,” says Dr. Fiala.

First, zillmerized contracts violate the requirement of equal value. Secondly, employees would be unduly disadvantaged. Thirdly, the portability of occupational pension contracts is not always possible and fourthly, the Federal Court of Justice and the Constitutional Court had already ruled that such zillmerisation violates the contractual objective of capital accumulation.

Search for alternatives Many options for occupational pension provision via salary conversion are now no longer available following the ruling from Munich. If the verdict is final. Insurance industry products are unlikely to meet the strict requirements. Banks have a better chance with classic interest-bearing investments. But even lucrative fund investments could be down because of front-end loads. Apart from that, by its very nature, no fund can guarantee stability of value.

 

by Dr. Johannes Fiala

courtesy of

from www.freenet.de (published on 06.06.2007)

Our office in Munich

You will find our office at Fasolt-Strasse 7 in Munich, very close to Schloss Nymphenburg. Our team consists of highly motivated attorneys who are available for all the needs of our clients. In special cases, our law firm cooperates with selected experts to represent your interests in the best possible way.


About the author

Dr. Johannes Fiala Dr. Johannes Fiala

Dr. Johannes Fiala has been working for more than 25 years as a lawyer and attorney with his own law firm in Munich. He is intensively involved in real estate, financial law, tax and insurance law. The numerous stages of his professional career enable him to provide his clients with comprehensive advice and to act as a lawyer in the event of disputes.
»More about Dr. Johannes Fiala

On these pages, Dr. Fiala provides information on current legal and economic topics as well as on current political changes that are of social and/or corporate relevance.

Arrange your personal appointment with us.

Make an appointment / call back service

You are already receiving legal advice and would like a second opinion? In this case please contact Dr. Fiala directly via the following link.

Obtain a second legal opinion

The first telephone call about your request is free of charge.