Garnishment trap for private pensions of self-employed persons

    The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has ruled in the
    November last year decided
    (Az. IX ZB 89/05) that private pensions from
    an accident or
    Occupational disability insurance from
    freelancers or self-employed persons no
    Enjoy garnishment protection. similar lies the
    The case of occupational pensions
    (bAV). The BGH allows the
    Insolvency administrator this even despite
    effective pledge and vesting
    (file no. IX ZR 138/04). Early provision for the
    Assets are therefore necessary for all concerned.
    In principle, therefore, only pensions and retirement pensions are deductible from the
    garnishment protection, which the employer (civil servant) or a
    Employer owes. Then the seizure allowance applies to single persons…
    of around 900 euros and for married couples of just under 1,400 euros. At the
    However, in the opinion of the Federal Government, there is no need for a
    the Karlsruhe judges “for attachment protection of pensions of
    no room in the first place”.

    The dilemma for the self-employed

    In doing so, the BGH clarified that only employees and civil servants who work for
    themselves or their dependants an old-age provision under insurance law
    benefit from the protection against execution. Thereby are
    refers exclusively to those private pensions which are ‘paid on the occasion of the
    termination of a contract of service or employment is justified
    become.” Continuing pensions of freelancers and self-employed persons
    are therefore not protected.
    Professionally self-employed people are only allowed to work within the narrow framework of the
    Code of Civil Procedure free to keep a small garnishment-free estate out of
    of an insurance company. However, since this pension is usually
    will be relatively small, these persons will later have to
    sometimes rely on supplementary social assistance.

    BGH: unequal treatment constitutional

    For the BGH this unequal treatment is constitutional (Az: IXa
    ZB 271/03): Thus self-employed persons appeared also today still in
    need protection to a lesser extent, because the people involved in the exercise of their
    activity is regularly linked to higher employment opportunities also a
    suggest further recourse to the law of enforcement.
    In addition, the BGH also refers to a “higher responsibility and
    Mündigkeit” of the self-employed and freelancers.

    Asset protection through different “asset spheres

    Therefore, those affected should be well informed and advised in order to
    not to get caught “cold” later. One possibility is the so
    asset protection. This includes
    the separation and formation of different spheres of assets.
    Professionally, these individuals should have a professional risk management
    operate If possible, combined with its own liability,
    which is separate from private assets.
    However, private assets can also be protected in part from the
    Protect creditor access. There are quite complicated approaches to this,
    which also include solutions abroad or foundations, trusts and own
    Include funds. For this reason, the persons concerned should
    and design the supply in time. Last minute at
    assets into a safe haven in the event of imminent insolvency.
    usually remains successful.

    Author(s): Attorney-at-law Dr. Johannes Fiala and Dipl.-Math. Peter A.
    Schramm

    (all4finance.com)

    Courtesy of www.all4finance.de.

    Videoberatung

    Sollten Sie ein zur Beratung ein Gesicht wünschen, können wir Ihnen auch eine Videoberatung anbieten.

    Persönlicher Termin

    Vereinbaren Sie Ihren persönlichen Termin bei uns.

    Juristische Zweit­meinung einholen

    Sie werden bereits juristisch beraten und wünschen eine Zweit­meinung? Nehmen Sie in diesem Fall über nach­stehenden Link direkt Kontakt mit Herrn Dr. Fiala auf.

      veröffentlicht am

        Garnishment trap for private pensions of self-employed persons

        Über den Autor

        Dr. Johannes Fiala PhD, MBA, MM

        Dr. Johannes Fiala ist seit mehr als 25 Jahren als Jurist und Rechts­anwalt mit eigener Kanzlei in München tätig. Er beschäftigt sich unter anderem intensiv mit den Themen Immobilien­wirtschaft, Finanz­recht sowie Steuer- und Versicherungs­recht. Die zahl­reichen Stationen seines beruf­lichen Werde­gangs ermöglichen es ihm, für seine Mandanten ganz­heitlich beratend und im Streit­fall juristisch tätig zu werden.
        » Mehr zu Dr. Johannes Fiala

        Auf diesen Seiten informiert Dr. Fiala zu aktuellen Themen aus Recht- und Wirt­schaft sowie zu aktuellen politischen Ver­änderungen, die eine gesell­schaftliche und / oder unter­nehmerische Relevanz haben.

        Videoberatung

        Vereinbaren Sie Ihren persönlichen Termin bei uns.

        Sie werden bereits juristisch beraten und wünschen eine Zweit­meinung? Nehmen Sie in diesem Fall über nach­stehenden Link direkt Kontakt mit Herrn Dr. Fiala auf.

        Das erste Telefonat ist ein kostenfreies Kennenlerngespräch; ohne Beratung.
        Sie erfahren was wir für Sie tun können und was wir von Ihnen an Informationen und
        Unterlagen für eine qualifizierte Beratung benötigen.

          Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner n/a