Health reform: Pitfalls for private health insurance policyholders

    New rules
    Those who want to take their age reserve with them when changing to a (different) private health insurance should not take this step until the first half of 2009.
    Experts believe that a shakeout is imminent in the private health insurance market. The health reform is not only likely to make premiums considerably more expensive – it is to be feared that one or the other insurer will disappear from the market.
    Basic tariff as a catch-all?
    Those who would like to be included in the new basic tariff can be poached – without benefit restrictions and without risk surcharges. Anyone wishing to switch from statutory health insurance to private health insurance must now be able to demonstrate an income above the assessment threshold for three years.
    Cost trap when switching to private health insurance
    Only those who change from one private comprehensive insurance to another in the first half of 2009 will have their ageing provision transferred from the old insurer. This means for policyholders who have a change recommended to them today that this (pro rata) ageing provision at the level of the basic tariff will not be included. The capital that is then missing with the new insurer has the effect of a loss – as an unnecessarily high insurance premium. Insurers and insurance brokers are often equally liable for such damages.
    Existential danger for PKV insurers
    The danger for the insurers of private health insurance companies results from the fact that the insured can take their age reserves (at the level of the basic tariff) with them – this is where money is supposed to actually flow. Some PKV insurers have already indicated that they will be well prepared in the first half of 2009 and will be on the hunt for all healthy people. These should then be able to be insured with their ageing provision in modern tariffs – not only in the basic tariff. And in these modern tariffs, in return, there is no equalisation in the industry between the good risks that have been switched and the bad risks that remain in the old tariffs. The compensation is in fact limited to the basic tariff. Those private health insurance companies that are among the real losers may subsequently raise their premiums substantially – not only because of rising average claims but also because of the decline in cancellations. He has had to accept cancellation losses, and now has to bear the entire overhead costs with his remaining policyholders – in fact, he might as well give up and join Medicator if no one else wants him. If rating companies (specialist organisations) and insurance brokers are unable to provide an answer to the question of which companies could be affected and how, it is hardly possible to comply with the duty of care in the case of private health insurance brokerage. Those insureds who did not save themselves in time by changing insurers might otherwise only be left with the basic tariff with maximum premium guarantee and risk equalisation in the industry. The broker’s liability should then be safe in such cases. A strategic option may be to use the small entitlement (health) or the large entitlement (health and old age) as a broker for its clients.
    Cancellations and premium increases foreseeable
    Overall, a double-digit percentage increase in private health insurance premiums is expected. The changer will be oriented towards the lower premium. Those who wish to do so may give ordinary notice of termination during the first six months of 2009, namely on the next ordinary termination date. This is then at least three months in the future, for example 31.12.2009. By law, it only depends on the fact that he gave notice before 01.07.2009, not on the effective date of the notice. The insurance industry will offer new modern tariffs in order to be part of the reinsurance business.
    Insurance broker liability due to gaps in orientation
    The age reserves can also be fully credited in the event of a change of tariff with the same insurer: Here, the standard tariff can be a real alternative to the basic tariff, also because of the increasingly broader assessment basis for the statutory health insurance contributions. For the self-employed and tradesmen, there is the possibility of obtaining an attractive combination of statutory pension and compulsory insurance via foreign countries. Those brokers who are aware of these European rules in a globalised landscape are better placed to avoid liability for advice.
    Insurer-. Sales and training manager liability
    Are these facts being deliberately hushed up by everyone today? The brokers and intermediaries would immediately lose their reinsurance business PKV-PKV today – until 01.01.2009. Business-minded, but unfortunately only half-informed intermediaries will more or less blindly accompany a change from one private health insurer to another before 1.1.2009. And in the first half of 2009, when customers do cancel their policies, they also contribute to the loss because they take their ageing provision with them, so it is not available for imputed inheritance. And after 30.06.2009, hardly anyone from the old portfolio will change the private health insurance company, because whoever wanted to, did it in the first half of 2009 – after that, the ageing provision will no longer be included. Only for new insureds, the ageing provisions may be included permanently.So the private health insurers also have an interest in keeping these facts quiet for as long as possible. The customer will be the first to suffer the consequences of this in the form of unnecessarily high premiums if he switches before 1.1.2009 – and shortly afterwards the intermediary or broker, who will be liable for giving incorrect advice.
    Doctor Johannes Fiala, Munich
    (Landpost 35/2007, 25)
    Courtesy of www.landpost.de.

    Videoberatung

    Sollten Sie ein zur Beratung ein Gesicht wünschen, können wir Ihnen auch eine Videoberatung anbieten.

    Persönlicher Termin

    Vereinbaren Sie Ihren persönlichen Termin bei uns.

    Juristische Zweit­meinung einholen

    Sie werden bereits juristisch beraten und wünschen eine Zweit­meinung? Nehmen Sie in diesem Fall über nach­stehenden Link direkt Kontakt mit Herrn Dr. Fiala auf.

      veröffentlicht am

        Health reform: Pitfalls for private health insurance policyholders

        Über den Autor

        Dr. Johannes Fiala PhD, MBA, MM

        Dr. Johannes Fiala ist seit mehr als 25 Jahren als Jurist und Rechts­anwalt mit eigener Kanzlei in München tätig. Er beschäftigt sich unter anderem intensiv mit den Themen Immobilien­wirtschaft, Finanz­recht sowie Steuer- und Versicherungs­recht. Die zahl­reichen Stationen seines beruf­lichen Werde­gangs ermöglichen es ihm, für seine Mandanten ganz­heitlich beratend und im Streit­fall juristisch tätig zu werden.
        » Mehr zu Dr. Johannes Fiala

        Auf diesen Seiten informiert Dr. Fiala zu aktuellen Themen aus Recht- und Wirt­schaft sowie zu aktuellen politischen Ver­änderungen, die eine gesell­schaftliche und / oder unter­nehmerische Relevanz haben.

        Videoberatung

        Vereinbaren Sie Ihren persönlichen Termin bei uns.

        Sie werden bereits juristisch beraten und wünschen eine Zweit­meinung? Nehmen Sie in diesem Fall über nach­stehenden Link direkt Kontakt mit Herrn Dr. Fiala auf.

        Das erste Telefonat ist ein kostenfreies Kennenlerngespräch; ohne Beratung.
        Sie erfahren was wir für Sie tun können und was wir von Ihnen an Informationen und
        Unterlagen für eine qualifizierte Beratung benötigen.

          Cookie Consent with Real Cookie Banner n/a