BR, Tuesday, 19 September 2006
In order to strengthen private old-age provision, an employee’s right to deferred compensation was enshrined in law in 2001 in the case of occupational pension provision (Section 1 a of the Occupational Pensions Act). In addition, such payments receive tax and social security benefits. Subsequently, many such contracts were concluded. At least three million employees pay part of their remuneration into company pension schemes.
Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. – Company pension scheme: pension via the company www.vorsorgedurchblick.de Now it turns out: many of these contracts are a bad deal for the employees. This is especially true if the premiums are initially used to pay the agents’ commission. If the employee has to terminate the old-age provision contract prematurely, for example because he becomes unemployed or changes jobs, he will not even get out again for years what he has already paid in.
Now there are court rulings which condemn the employer to compensate the employee for the damage (e.g. Amtsgericht Stuttgart 19 Ca 3152/04 v. 17.1.2005) because the employer did not inform the employee about impending losses due to conclusion and cancellation costs. To understand: the employer enters into the insurance contract, into which the employee then pays.
The presiding judge of the Federal Labour Court, Dr. Gerhard Reinecke, who heads the senate responsible for occupational pensions, is even of the opinion that these “zillmerised” tariffs are in principle not permissible in occupational pensions. The employer is liable regardless of fault.
Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. – Claim for damages www.vorsorgedurchblick.de Background: There are great opportunities for insurance companies in this market thanks to state subsidies. The costs involved in the contracts are almost impossible for the contracting parties to comprehend. Ralph Kiening, fee consultant of the Bamberg European Pension Services, means in addition from his practice: “For the craftsman, for the company boss, for the employee is not at all evident, which costs are contained in the contracts.”
The “Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband” in Berlin has already obtained a judgement against Allianz Pensionskasse because of the lack of transparency of the acquisition costs.
The judgement as pdf document www.experten.de Consumer protector Dorothea small sees problems above all, if employees are charged commissions in advance: This leads in the doubt to financial losses, not however to the structure of a reasonable age precaution, profit does alone the selling. This cannot be in the spirit of a state pension scheme. That’s why we’re calling for a ban on such contracts.”
The press release of the Federation of German Consumer Organisations on the judgement For companies, the liability judgements also raise the question: must possible damages be included in the balance sheet? Johannes Fiala, a lawyer from Munich who specialises in company pension schemes, points out that this can have nasty consequences: “In an example case from our company with 1,200 employees, 1.2 million euros were paid in each of the three years, 3.6 million in total. The actuary involved has calculated that three million of that is missing. Only 0.6 million remain today. If the company had to put the missing three million on its balance sheet, it would be broke today.”
The boss is guaranteed not to be threatened with claims for damages if he calls in a neutral adviser at his own expense instead of the usual intermediary. In return for a fee, the latter assists him in the selection of contracts that are favourable and do not include any acquisition costs. For the employees, this makes itself felt as a fat plus in the company pension.
(Report: Katharina Adami) (As of mid-September 2006)
Courtesy ofwww.DasErste.de andwww.brnet.de.
Our office in Munich
You will find our office at Fasolt-Strasse 7 in Munich, very close to Schloss Nymphenburg. Our team consists of highly motivated attorneys who are available for all the needs of our clients. In special cases, our law firm cooperates with selected experts to represent your interests in the best possible way.
About the author
Dr. Johannes Fiala has been working for more than 25 years as a lawyer and attorney with his own law firm in Munich. He is intensively involved in real estate, financial law, tax and insurance law. The numerous stages of his professional career enable him to provide his clients with comprehensive advice and to act as a lawyer in the event of disputes.
»More about Dr. Johannes Fiala
On these pages, Dr. Fiala provides information on current legal and economic topics as well as on current political changes that are of social and/or corporate relevance.
Arrange your personal appointment with us.
You are already receiving legal advice and would like a second opinion? In this case please contact Dr. Fiala directly via the following link.
The first telephone call about your request is free of charge.