Emigrating as a Self-Employed Professional: Legal Pitfalls beyond the Tax Question

Published on 12.10.2026

Emigrating as a Self-Employed Professional

Note on scope: This article deliberately sets itself apart from our article Relocating a Business Abroad as a Freelancer or Sole Trader, which concentrates on exit taxation (Entstrickungsbesteuerung) under Section 4 (1) of the German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz, EStG). The present article instead deals with the pitfalls of professional regulation and trade law when emigrating as a self-employed professional (Freiberufler), i.e. the questions that remain even when the tax side has already been planned properly: recognition of qualifications abroad, chamber obligations when continuing German mandates, and the often underestimated fact that the German “Freiberufler” status usually does not exist at all as a legal category in the destination country.

Anyone who emigrates as a self-employed professional usually plans the tax side meticulously: exit tax (Wegzugsteuer), exit taxation of business assets, double taxation agreements. What is regularly overlooked is that the professional activity itself (the law practice, the medical practice, the tax advisory office, the engineering or architectural work) is subject abroad to an entirely separate legal order that has nothing to do with German tax law. Whether one’s own qualification is recognised in the destination country at all, whether German chamber membership is jeopardised when German mandates are continued from abroad, and whether the familiar German “Freiberufler” status has any equivalent in the destination country are questions that must be answered independently of tax planning, and in an emergency they decide on the right to practise the profession itself.

Four Legal Areas That Must Be Examined Separately

Emigrating as a self-employed professional touches on at least four mutually independent areas of law, each of which follows its own rules, deadlines and authorities:

1. Professional law and recognition of qualifications: May the professional activity be carried on in the destination country at all in its previous form? Covered in this article.
2. Professional conduct and chamber law: Does the German admission remain in place if the law practice, medical practice or advisory office is moved abroad? Covered in this article.
3. Trade and business law in the destination country: How is the activity legally classified there in the first place? A “Freiberufler” in the German sense does not exist as a category in many legal systems. Covered in this article.
4. Tax law and social security law: These two areas are dealt with in separate, in-depth articles, on exit taxation in the case of relocating a business abroad and on compulsory social insurance for digital nomads in detail. They are only briefly summarised for context at the end of this article.

Recognition of Professional Qualifications Abroad

Regulated and Non-Regulated Professions

The decisive course is set before the move: is the profession regulated in the destination country, i.e. an activity whose taking up or pursuit is subject to proof of specific professional qualifications, or is it a non-regulated activity? Classic regulated liberal professions are attorney, tax adviser, public auditor, doctor, dentist, pharmacist, architect and engineer in certain fields of activity. For these, the German professional qualification alone is not automatically sufficient to work in the destination country; a formal recognition procedure is required. For non-regulated activities, for example in IT, design or consulting, this hurdle generally does not apply; here, the primary question is the classification under trade law dealt with in the next section.

An Overview of the Professional Qualifications Directive 2005/36/EC

Within the European Union, Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications, most recently modernised by Directive 2013/55/EU, sets the legal framework. It expressly applies to nationals of a Member State who wish to pursue a regulated profession, as self-employed persons, liberal professionals or employees, in a Member State other than the one in which they obtained their qualification. The Directive distinguishes between three fundamentally different routes to recognition:

• Automatic recognition for an exhaustive list of sectoral professions with minimum training requirements harmonised across the EU, in particular doctors, dentists, veterinary surgeons, midwives and nurses, pharmacists and, with restrictions, architects. Here, the evidence of formal qualifications is recognised without an individual examination of content.
• General system of recognition (Title III Chapter I of the Directive) for all other regulated professions, including attorneys, tax advisers and most engineering professions. If there are “substantial differences” between the German training and the requirements of the destination state, the host state may require a compensation measure, either an adaptation period or an aptitude test; for most legal and tax advisory professions, the applicant may choose between the two.
• Freedom to provide services without full recognition (Title II, Art. 5–9 of the Directive) for merely temporary and occasional cross-border activity. Anyone who does not establish their service permanently in the destination country but only provides it there occasionally can work under simplified conditions, usually a prior written declaration, without having to go through the full recognition procedure. For a permanent relocation of one’s centre of life and professional activity, as in a genuine emigration, this relief generally does not apply; the right of establishment is then decisive.

In addition, separate, more specific directives exist for individual professional groups. For attorneys, for example, the Establishment Directive 98/5/EC makes it possible to practise permanently in another Member State under the home-country professional title (in Germany, “Rechtsanwalt”) without first going through a recognition procedure. After at least three years of effective and regular activity in the law of the host state, full admission to the legal profession there, and thus the right to use the local professional title, can additionally be applied for.

Practical Consequence: Notification before Starting Work

In practice, it is often overlooked that recognition, whichever of the three routes applies, requires an active procedure that must be initiated in good time before the activity is taken up in the destination country. Anyone who moves their law practice, medical practice or advisory work abroad and only discovers on the spot that the competent authority requires a recognition procedure taking several months to process risks a phase in which they cannot work with legal certainty either in the country of origin or in the destination country.

← Tabelle nach links wischen, um weitere Spalten zu sehen

Chamber Obligations When Continuing German Mandates from Abroad

One aspect that is particularly often underestimated when planning to emigrate as a self-employed professional: anyone who, as an attorney, tax adviser or doctor, wishes to continue serving their German clients or patients from abroad remains bound to the German chamber organisation, with its own profession-specific requirements, the disregard of which can in the worst case lead to the loss of admission.

Attorneys: Duty to Maintain an Office, Exemption and Authorised Recipient

In principle, an attorney is obliged under Section 27 of the Federal Lawyers’ Act (Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung, BRAO) to establish and maintain an office in the district of the regional bar association (Rechtsanwaltskammer) of which he or she is a member. In the course of the major BRAO reform of 1 August 2022, a relief of considerable practical importance was confirmed and clarified: an attorney who establishes his or her office exclusively in another state is exempted from the domestic duty to maintain an office (Kanzleipflicht) under Section 29a (2) BRAO. However, this exemption is tied to a mandatory counterpart: the attorney must name to the regional bar association an authorised recipient for service (Zustellungsbevollmächtigter) who resides in Germany or has business premises there (Section 30 BRAO); the law provides for no exceptions to this obligation. In addition, this authorised recipient must be given access to the special electronic lawyers’ mailbox (besonderes elektronisches Anwaltspostfach, beA), so that at least the taking note of incoming mail and the submission of electronic acknowledgements of receipt are ensured. An attorney who moves his or her office abroad without making this notification risks consequences under professional law, up to and including measures by the regional bar association against the continued admission.

Tax Advisers: Duty to Maintain a Professional Establishment under Section 34 StBerG

For tax advisers (Steuerberater) and tax agents (Steuerbevollmächtigte), a structurally comparable but separately regulated obligation applies. Under Section 34 of the German Tax Advisory Act (Steuerberatungsgesetz, StBerG), a professional establishment must be set up and maintained without undue delay after appointment; for self-employed tax advisers, this is the independent practice from which the profession is predominantly carried on. The sanction under professional law in the event of a complete move abroad is of particular practical relevance: under Section 46 StBerG, the appointment as tax adviser may be revoked if the professional establishment is moved abroad without an authorised recipient for service resident in Germany being named. The name and address of the authorised recipient, and any change in the person or address, must be notified to the competent chamber of tax advisers (Steuerberaterkammer) without undue delay. For tax advisers who merely wish to maintain an additional advisory office (Beratungsstelle) elsewhere in the EU/EEA or in Switzerland while their actual professional seat remains in Germany, the law also provides a relief: the otherwise required proximity of the head of a further advisory office to its location does not apply in these states; the competent chamber of tax advisers can approve a corresponding exception on application.

Doctors and Members of the Healing Professions

For doctors, the special feature under professional law lies less in a residence requirement than in the combination of licensing law (Approbationsrecht) and the professional code of conduct. The licence to practise medicine (Approbation) is valid throughout Germany and is not tied to a domestic residence; anyone who has obtained it does not lose it automatically by moving abroad. However, the obligation to notify the competent state medical association (Landesärztekammer) remains, and anyone who continues to treat German patients from abroad must observe the requirements of the model professional code. Of practical importance here is Section 7 (4) of the Model Professional Code for Physicians (Musterberufsordnung für Ärzte, MBO-Ä): since the corresponding relaxation in 2018, exclusively remote treatment, i.e. treatment without prior personal contact, has been permissible under professional law, provided that it is carried out while maintaining the necessary medical care, in particular with regard to diagnosis, advice, treatment and documentation, and the patient is informed about the special features of this form of treatment. A doctor who looks after German patients from abroad exclusively by remote treatment is therefore not per se acting outside what is permissible under professional law, but must comply with these requirements just like a colleague established in Germany; depending on the destination country, there are also local rules of its own on practising telemedicine from there.

Overview: Chamber Obligations When Moving Abroad

← Tabelle nach links wischen, um weitere Spalten zu sehen

Trade Registration vs. Freiberufler Status: Different Definitions in the Destination Country

The German Freiberufler Privilege Rarely Has an Equivalent Abroad

The German legal concept of the self-employed professional under Section 18 EStG, with its catalogue professions and the activities “similar” to them, is a peculiarity of German law that above all has tax consequences: no liability to trade tax (Gewerbesteuer), no compulsory membership of the Chamber of Industry and Commerce (IHK), no bookkeeping obligation under commercial law. Anyone who emigrates and expects this familiar category to continue in a comparable form in the destination country is regularly mistaken. Most legal systems either have a uniform, undifferentiated category of self-employment, such as the Spanish “autónomo” or the French “auto-entrepreneur” or the “profession libérale” regime, or they base the distinction on criteria entirely different from those of German law. An activity that is undisputedly a liberal profession in Germany may readily be classified in the destination country as a trading or commercial activity, with the corresponding registration, bookkeeping and contribution obligations under local law.

Double Registration Obligations as a Practical Consequence

This different classification often leads in practice to a double registration problem. If the professional activity is formally continued in Germany, for example because individual German mandates continue to be handled from there, while a new registration as a self-employed person or trader required in the destination country is added, parallel sets of obligations arise in two legal systems that must be fulfilled independently of each other. Conversely, if the German activity is discontinued completely without a corresponding registration being made in the destination country without delay, a legal grey area can arise in which the activity is not properly registered in either state. For the German part of this registration: anyone who, unlike the classic self-employed professional, starts a business as a commercial sole trader must notify the competent authority under Section 14 (1) of the German Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung, GewO); failure to file the trade notification (Gewerbeanzeige) in time can be punished with a fine of up to EUR 1,000, although the amounts actually imposed in practice are considerably lower and depend on the duration of the delay and on turnover. This administrative consequence is generally manageable; the real danger lies not in the German range of fines but in working in the destination country without the registration required there, which, depending on the legal system, can have much more drastic consequences, up to and including the invalidity of contracts concluded or exclusion from the local social security system.

Compulsory Social Insurance for Self-Employed Professionals Abroad

The social security side of emigrating as a self-employed professional must be kept legally entirely separate from the professional law and tax side and is dealt with in detail in a separate article. In essence: within the EU, the EEA and Switzerland, Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 coordinates which system applies, mostly according to the principle of the place of work; outside this area, unless a bilateral social security agreement applies, what matters is the narrow concept of posting abroad (Ausstrahlung) under Section 4 of Book IV of the German Social Code (SGB IV), whose requirements many self-employed professionals emigrating freely and indefinitely do not meet, with the result that compulsory German health, pension and long-term care insurance ends and must be actively reorganised. The details (posting, A1 certificate, Ausstrahlung, voluntary continued insurance) are presented in depth in the article on compulsory social insurance for digital nomads.

Do Not Lose Sight of Tax Connecting Factors

The tax side also remains a separate point of examination when emigrating as a self-employed professional, going beyond the professional and trade law questions dealt with in this article. Two connecting factors are of particular practical relevance. First, exit taxation under Section 4 (1) sentences 3 and 4 EStG, which can apply when assets, such as practice equipment or a client base, are transferred abroad, and, in the event of a complete cessation of business, the special rule in Section 16 (3a) EStG; both are explained in detail in the article on relocating a business abroad as a self-employed professional. Second, the question of whether, despite the move, a residence (Wohnsitz) under Section 8 of the German Fiscal Code (Abgabenordnung, AO) or a habitual abode (gewöhnlicher Aufenthalt) under Section 9 AO continues to exist in Germany, for example because a flat is kept “just in case”, which can maintain unlimited German tax liability regardless of the actual stay abroad; this aspect is examined in depth in the article on digital nomads and habitual abode.

Reporting Obligations Backed by Fines: An Often Overlooked Point

In addition to the professional law reporting obligations towards the respective chamber, emigrating as a self-employed professional entails further reporting obligations under tax procedure law, non-compliance with which is directly subject to fines. Particularly relevant for self-employed professionals working across borders who set up structures with a foreign element in the course of emigrating is the obligation to report cross-border tax arrangements under Sections 138d et seq. AO (DAC6): the report must be made within 30 days of the first reportable event (Section 138f (2) AO); anyone who, as an intermediary or user, intentionally or recklessly fails to fulfil this obligation, or fails to fulfil it completely or in time, risks a fine of up to EUR 25,000 under Section 379 AO. Whether an arrangement chosen in the course of emigrating, such as the involvement of a foreign company or a tax-motivated choice of location, falls under this reporting obligation at all must be examined in the individual case and should not be assessed on one’s own.

← Tabelle nach links wischen, um weitere Spalten zu sehen

Checklist: Legal Pitfalls before Emigrating as a Self-Employed Professional

← Tabelle nach links wischen, um weitere Spalten zu sehen

Hypothetical Example

The following example is entirely fictitious and serves solely as an illustration; it does not describe a real case or a real person. A self-employed tax adviser plans to move her centre of life to Portugal but would like to continue serving some of her existing German clients from there. If she concentrates exclusively on the tax planning of her move, she can easily overlook three separate questions of professional and trade law. First, whether and in what form she may work as a tax adviser in Portugal: tax advisory work is regulated differently there than in Germany, so a separate recognition procedure may be required for practising the profession there. Second, that in order to maintain her German appointment after moving her professional establishment abroad, she must name an authorised recipient for service resident in Germany and notify the chamber of tax advisers accordingly, so as not to risk the revocation of her appointment under Section 46 StBerG. Third, that her previous German classification as a self-employed professional has no automatic counterpart in Portugal, and that, regardless of her German status, she needs her own registration there in accordance with local rules as soon as she carries on business locally. Only clarifying all three points, in parallel with the tax planning, makes her move plannable with legal certainty.

Conclusion

In practice, emigrating as a self-employed professional is too often reduced to a pure tax question. In fact, the legal success of the project depends at least as much on three other points: recognition of one’s own qualification in the destination country under the Professional Qualifications Directive 2005/36/EC; maintaining German chamber membership when continuing German mandates, with the respective requirements of the BRAO, the StBerG and the medical code of professional conduct, some of which are relevant to fines and to admission; and the realisation that the German Freiberufler status regularly has no direct equivalent in the destination country and must be classified anew in its own right. Anyone who thinks through these three levels early and in parallel with tax and social security planning avoids the most common category of failed emigration plans in practice: correctly taxed in legal terms, but in a grey area under professional law.

Individual Advice on Emigrating as a Self-Employed Professional

Which requirements under professional law apply in the individual case depends largely on the specific profession, the chosen destination country and whether German mandates are to be continued from abroad. The law firm of attorney Johannes Fiala, focusing on international tax, corporate and professional law, supports self-employed professionals in identifying the legal pitfalls of emigrating at an early stage, from the recognition of qualifications and chamber obligations to classification under trade law in the destination country, and in structuring the move with legal certainty. Please get in touch with the firm without obligation to discuss your plans in an initial consultation.