Subscription right in direct insurance

Rate this post

On the liability of insurance companies, agents and insurance brokers for incorrect design on the part of the legislator

Insurance brokers have always had a particularly heavy responsibility towards their customers. In the German Insurance Contract Act (VVG), the legislator has expressly defined the liability of the insurance intermediary in §§ 59 ff. VVG.


Obligation to pay contributions to statutory health insurance (GKV) avoidable

In the normal case of a direct insurance company’s lump-sum payment, 1/120th for 10 years from the month following the payment is subject to compulsory contributions to the SHI system. Only domestic insurers are subject to a reporting obligation to the SHI system. SHI and nursing care contributions must also be paid even if there is no lump-sum payment to the pensioner, but the lump sum is only due as a death benefit for the survivors. This does not change even if the deceased pensioner was himself insured in the private health insurance (PKV) (Federal Social Court, BSG ruling of 25.04.2012, Ref. B 12 KR 19/10 R).

Without SHI membership and survivor’s benefits no obligation to pay contributions

If, however, the pensioner dies during the 10-year period after the start of the pension, the obligation to pay SHI contributions ends without any transfer to the heirs, regardless of whether it is a lump-sum payment or a pension. If the survivors are insured in the private health insurance or if there is no obligation to take out statutory health insurance due to a stay abroad, no contributions are payable. In many cases, the surviving dependents also include companions who are also beneficiaries. However, survivors’ benefits are often not subject to inheritance tax (Hamburg Tax Court, ruling of 31.10.2012, ref. 3 K 24/12 n.rkr).

Structuring of the estate and subscription right decides on compulsory health insurance

If no subscription right is granted to provide for surviving dependents in old age, disability or death, the death benefit is included in the estate. Depending on the content of the agreement with the insurer, the obligation to pay SHI contributions can then be avoided. The agreement with the employer alone will not be decisive. Alternatively, in the case of older direct insurance policies, the insurance benefit can be bequeathed to a legal entity, such as a non-profit organisation or a foundation (possibly its own), even if the latter is to be set up only after death. A non-self-sustaining legacy to natural persons could also be envisaged.

Revocable and irrevocable subscription right in combination

In many cases, employees often overlook the fact that they have an irrevocable subscription right granted to them by the employer in the direct insurance policy from the time of vesting at the latest. If the employer becomes insolvent, the employee then often has to do without his direct insurance for occupational pension provision, and in return receives up to less than 50% of the expected benefits from the Pensionssicherungsverein, if the contract – alternatively also with the employee’s consent – was lent on. This is because the future surpluses are then first used to top up the guaranteed benefit.

If, however, an irrevocable subscription right is also provided for the surviving dependants instead of a revocable or possibly no subscription right at all, the option of eliminating the personal preferential treatment by revocation or non-acceptance is no longer available, which means that the assets can no longer be included in the estate by structuring.

Liability of insurance agents and brokers

Insurance intermediaries often take on the task of looking after their customers and advising employees on company pension schemes. Despite legal obligation since 22.05.2007, occasionally no documentation is created or handed over until today. This leads to a reversal of the burden of proof on the part of the intermediary.

Up to more than 5 percent of the persons directly insured die before the start of the pension. This means that at least one in 20 direct insurance policies mediated is affected. With an average commission of EUR 2,000 each (totalling EUR 40,000), a potential liability case results in an 18% SHI/care contribution rate from a direct insurance policy with, for example, EUR 125,000 maturity benefit, which corresponds to a liability or damage potential of around EUR 22,500.

Macial malpractice in insurance mediation

Insurance intermediaries are obliged to make normal legal arrangements within the framework of the insurance law options. This is no different with direct insurance than if the beneficiary, in the event of death of a normal risk or life insurance policy, is better not to become a policyholder at the same time in order to save inheritance tax.

Flagging out to avoid compulsory health insurance?

Temporary emigration can also help beneficiaries, policyholders or survivors to save on social insurance due to the lack of compulsory health insurance. Mallorca should be avoided despite price decline in the real estate as a place of residence, because there the entire expiry benefit would then be taxable – even a death benefit. If you choose to reside in Canada, you would have to pay tax in Germany on the difference between the value of the insurance and the value of the insurance before immigration. Tax law is not coordinated even within the EU – insurance brokers will rarely know more than the main German tax regulations on life insurance and should therefore be cautious about statements on tax treatment in cases with a foreign connection.

by Dr. Johannes Fiala and Dipl.-Math. Peter A. Schramm


by courtesy of

www.channelpartner.der (published on 25.04.2017)



Our office in Munich

You will find our office at Fasolt-Strasse 7 in Munich, very close to Schloss Nymphenburg. Our team consists of highly motivated attorneys who are available for all the needs of our clients. In special cases, our law firm cooperates with selected experts to represent your interests in the best possible way.

About the author

Dr. Johannes Fiala Dr. Johannes Fiala

Dr. Johannes Fiala has been working for more than 25 years as a lawyer and attorney with his own law firm in Munich. He is intensively involved in real estate, financial law, tax and insurance law. The numerous stages of his professional career enable him to provide his clients with comprehensive advice and to act as a lawyer in the event of disputes.
»More about Dr. Johannes Fiala

On these pages, Dr. Fiala provides information on current legal and economic topics as well as on current political changes that are of social and/or corporate relevance.

Arrange your personal appointment with us.

Make an appointment / call back service

You are already receiving legal advice and would like a second opinion? In this case please contact Dr. Fiala directly via the following link.

Obtain a second legal opinion

The first telephone call about your request is free of charge.